Computing and Learning Towards Interactive †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Computing and Learning Towards Interactive. Answer: Introduction In todays organizational life, decision making is perceived as a continuation of the mans systematic ways of looking for guidance from the stars and unforeseen powers (Koksalan et al., 2013).Sometimes back, Chester Barnard who, a retired telephone executive and author of The Functions of Executive used the term decision making from the Lexicon of Public Administration into the world of business and started replacing the descriptors such as resource allocation and policy making. With the introduction of the phrase, managers changed their way of thinking and spurred on the new crispness of actions desiring for conclusiveness (Vaiman et al., 2012). According to William Starbuck, a professor in residence at the University of Oregons Charles, policy making is a continuous process that needs constant allocation of resources; therefore, decisions imply the end of deliberations and the beginning of the actions as Albert Camus, concludes that life is the sum of all our choices. The study of d ecision-making by some intellectuals and disciplines all finds that every decision have ultimate influence on our behaviors. Therefore more research has been accomplished to help the current managers on how to make decisions. A decision is a conscious choice to behave in a set particular way in a given circumstance either formally or informally. The formal decisions are the more relative, non-routine, complex and non-repetitive since the procedure used does not always exist while the informal decisions tend to be repetitive and have a nature of routine since there is an existence of the systems used (Asemi et al., 2011). Decision making has received different definitions according to different philosophers and researchers such as Mintzberg Henry, James Stoner, and Peter Drucker. According to James Stroner, decision-making is a process of identifying and selecting a suitable course of actions to solve a particular problem. By following these steps, one can make more deliberate thoughtful decisions by organizing the relevant informations and defining options. According to James Stoner, the decision-making has three components which are the alternatives, the choices and the problem (Damnjanovic Jankovic, 20 14). According to Peter Drucker, decision-making is a process whereby an individual performs a conclusion about a situation following a course of behaviors that must be done. According to Henry Mintzberg, decision making is the process of diagnosing a problem, identifying possible solutions, evaluating on the best and the making the action (Cooper et al., 2014). Decision making is critical for every organizational management as it tends to differentiate a real manager form a non-manager as decisions are always required in planning, controlling and organizing (Cui, 2015). According to all these three authors, it is evident that decision-making is a process followed by an individual to arrive at the best solution for a particular problem. Decisions are made in accordance to different kinds of situations such as; Decisions on Whether, Decisions on Which and Conditional or Contingent Decisions. Decisions on Whether, involves a yes or no instances; a situation whereby the individual has only two fixed choices to make ( Cooper et al., 2014). A Decision on Which means a situation where an individual has more than two options to make hence picking on the best alternative while the Conditional decisions are always as a result of already made conditions hence making it easier for the action. A great number of individual faces imperfectability of making decisions, due to ignorance of the models, strategies, approaches and techniques required for the process, therefore, several models and approaches have been made by several theorists to achieve them (Del Messier et al., 2011). Decision theory is the study of the reasoning underlying individual choices classified into two branches; that are normative decision theory which gives the best advises to arrive at the best solution (Damnjanovic Jankovic, 2014). The theory aims at finding the tools, methodologies, and software to assist individuals to make better decisions while the descriptive decision-making theory aims at analyzing how the existing, possibly irrational people make their best choices. In short, the normative theory explains how decisions should be made while the descriptive theory explains how to make decisions. There have been other several theories that have been developed and implemented in many organization s that are believed to be mathematical, such as casual, evidential, game and Bayesian theories (Salama, 2015). The causal theory, according to Immanuel Kant, is an old one that adopts the principle of rational choice that implies that every outcome is as a result of the type of the made decisions. Game theory is a mathematical study of strategic decision-making as it takes into the account the conflict and cooperation between decision-makers and the reasonable rationale. Evidential decision theory believes that the best option is always the best outcome of the irrational thinking while the Bayesian theory that adopts the probability aspects and logical reasoning in making decisions. Different decision-making theories can also be viewable through analyzing different approaches and procedures that are involved. The main approaches that are involved include authoritarian, group and automating system. The authoritarian approach is where an individual or a leader makes a decision based on personal knowledge and experience and later communicate the decisions to the subordinate to follow (Margalit, 2011). The leader's vision is transmitted into the minds of the subordinates and carefully supervised to complete the tasks. According to Douglas McGregors theory X, leaders are supposed to coerce and control followers to accomplish the organization's objectives. The approach is characterizable by a downward one-way communication from the leaders, presence set rules and procedures, leaders always dominate the interaction, and obedient behaviors are rewardable while erroneous actions are punishable. The authoritarian approach of decision-making is best when the available time for the decision is limited since the leader does not have to consult, or rather have a concession; however, it is disadvantaged with leadership lack of creativity in problem-solving. The group decision is also known as the collaborative approach where individuals faced with a problem collectively make a unanimous choice (Xu, 2011). The approach aims at making the best choices by analyzing the available alternatives to fit a specified objective. Unlike in the authoritarian approach where the leader spends less time in making a decision and more time in communicating the decisions to the subordinates, the group approach, the leaders tend to spend more time in analysis of choice and it no longer attributable to any individual. The process is characterized by participatory by all members without any form of discriminatory and sharing of the leadership roles. The decision-making process requires the group to follow a detailed process staring with the brainstorming of ideas by the group members. The brainstorming session is usually unstructured as many ideas, questions from the members are raised to make proper understanding of the problem through the facilitator. The second stage is the dialectical inquiry, a technique that focuses on ensuring that all the alternatives are considerable through dividing the group members into two sides, those that support from those that oppose. The two members give out their views on that particular decision to be made after the debate. The third stage is the nominal group technique, whereby each group member is required to compose a comprehensive list of the ideas on the proposed alternatives in writing and the after clarifications verbally communicated.An automating system approach is an automated approach to computers used for administrative purposes such as in calculating payments following a set form ula. According to Mintzberg decision-making strategy, the organization structure and management roles are being broken down to promote a clear understanding of the organization. It provides the functions of decisions in the management (Eastwood et al., 2011).According to Peter Drucker, the decision-making process has to follow the detailed process to be effective on the problem. Peter Drucker, states the following steps; problem clarification whereby, a problem is perceived to be falling under two categories that are generic and unique. In the generic, there are set rules since there is an experience of the problem while unique classification insists that each problem is treated individually. The second stage is problem definition whereby an individual work out what the situation is all about and adequately states the key issues. The third stage is the problem specification, whereby the decision maker defines the type of the choice that needs accomplishments. According to Drucker, the wro ng decision is not always a bad issue, but the continued changes of the set minimal goals during the decision-making process. The fourth step is making the best choice, a choice that meets all the set minimal goals from the alternatives that are available after critical analysis. The fifth step is the process of converting the choice made into action by describing all the responsibilities to be undertaken for the implementation after which the decision maker awaits the feedback of the process. Other strategies are optimizing whereby the decision maker select the best option among the listed alternatives in consideration of the time, limit, cost of other alternatives and the resource availability(Tofun, 2014). The satisficing strategy gives the first choice to the more satisfactory alternative rather than the best. The word satisficing is from two words, satisfy and sufficient to consider in any choice. Maximax strategy is where the decision maker maximizes on the maximums as the choice made is an alternative with maximum profits. The strategy is also referred as optimist decision-making strategy as the favorable outcome expected, and potentials are the most aspects of concern. The strategy mostly applies when risk is acceptable, and there is failure toleration. The maximin strategy is considered to be that of pessimists as it chooses the worst outcome of all alternatives since it chooses the one with the highest minimum. The strategy is always expensive, and failure tolera ted. Decisions have been viewed as the individuals prerogative, as the information used, the logic used are always in mind. For successive decision-making, leaders have to go through specific process and techniques (Alvino Franco, 2017). These are; decision tree that uses graphic format since human eye finds it easy to make decisions tree. The evaluation at each node and each node represents alternatives. The consultations technique is the most common in most of the organizations as the decision maker, or the manager takes the views of potential stakeholders, by asking the right questions to get the right answers. The experience technique is considered to be the best teacher as the evaluation and choices made follows the past situations. However, a proper analysis should always be done in every situation since the present particular situations might not conform to the past choices resulting in entirely different results. The cost-benefiting analysis technique is a systematic way to deter mine the benefits and the costs of the perceived decision rather than the risks that might be attached (Su et al., 2014). The simulation technique is a scientific tool used the real world process whereby there is no past knowledge on a particular issue. It entails the optimization, testing, education and safety engineering. Bad decisions always result when an individual overrides the senses and make a choice on a poor alternative (Drucker, 2015). As a result of lack of the sufficient number of options, inadequate information, a limited time frame for proper analysis, ignorance of evaluation techniques, uncritical acceptance of others judgment and inaccurate forecasting of external influences such as government. Conclusion In conclusion, decision-making is perceivable as a skill that has room for improvement through the use of different models, theories and techniques. The theories are applied depending on the situation, for example, the descriptive theory of decision-making is more difficult to put into practice as it gives biased behavioral l practice that can not conform to the several situations; therefore it is unwise to advise individuals with normative theories. To make a good decision, both the descriptive and normative should use to complement each other. References Alvino, L., Franco, M. (2017). The decision-making process between rationality and emotions. International Journal Of Scientific Research And Management. https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v5i9.18 Asemi, A., Safari, A., Asemi Zavareh, A. (2011). The Role of Management Information System (MIS) and Decision Support System (DSS) for Managers Decision Making Process. International Journal Of Business And Management, 6(7). https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n7p164 Cooper, D., Connolly, T., Kugler, T. (2014). Lay Personality Theories in Interactive Decisions: Strongly Held, Weakly Supported. Journal Of Behavioral Decision Making, 28(3), 201-213. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1842 Cui, Z. (2015). Decision Making in Cross-Functional Teams: The Role of Decision Power*. Decision Sciences, 47(3), 492-523. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/deci.12188 Damnjanovic, K., Jankovic, I. (2014). Normative and descriptive theories of decision making under risk. Theoria, Beograd, 57(4), 25-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo1404025d Del Missier, F., Mntyl, T., Bruin, W. (2011). Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities. Journal Of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4), 331-351. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.731 Drucker, P. (2015). Managing for results. [Place of publication not identified]: Routledge. Eastwood, J., Snook, B., Luther, K. (2011). What People Want From Their Professionals: Attitudes Toward Decision-making Strategies. Journal Of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(5), 458-468. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.741 Eastwood, J., Snook, B., Luther, K. (2011). What People Want From Their Professionals: Attitudes Toward Decision-making Strategies. Journal Of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(5), 458-468. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.741 Kksalan, M., Wallenius, J., Zionts, S. (2013). An Early History of Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Journal Of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 20(1-2), 87-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1481 Margalit, L. (2011). Coercive Approach and Decision Making Models. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1974141 Salama, A. (2015). New Approaches for Decision Making in Information Systems via Decision Diagrams. British Journal Of Mathematics Computer Science, 8(6), 418-432. https://dx.doi.org/10.9734/bjmcs/2015/17456 SU, C., LI, H. (2014). Approaches to Affective Computing and Learning towards Interactive Decision Making in Process Control Engineering. Acta Automatica Sinica, 39(5), 617-625. https://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1004.2013.00617 TOFAN, C. (2014). Optimization Techniques of Decision Making - Decision Tree. Advances In Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(5), 142-148. https://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.15.437 Vaiman, V., Scullion, H., Collings, D. (2012). Talent management decision making. Management Decision, 50(5), 925-941. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227663 XU, Z. (2011). APPROACHES TO MULTI-STAGE MULTI-ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING. International Journal Of Information Technology Decision Making, 10(01), 121-146. https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219622011004257